The Psychology Of Curiosity Boris Smus Just like some think about thinking, others are curious about curiosity. more specifically, i recently read a vox article that suggested "the more scientifically curious people are, the more they are immune to the power of partisan thinking". Google verified email at smus homepage human computer interaction articles 1–20.
The Psychology Of Curiosity Boris Smus The new account interprets curiosity as a form of cognitively induced deprivation that arises from the perception of a gap in knowledge or understanding. Curiosity has long fascinated laymen and scholars alike, but remains poorly understood as a psychological phenomenon. we argue that one factor impeding our understanding has been too much focus on delineating what is and is not curiosity. The article reviews the development of curiosity research across two significant waves. the first wave in the 1960s emphasized psychological foundations of curiosity. Curiosity has been that between state and trait curiosity. state curiosity refers to curiosity in a particular situation, whereas trait curios ity refers to a general capacity or propensity to experience curi osity. for example, naylor's mci includes trait and state.
The Psychology Of Curiosity Boris Smus The article reviews the development of curiosity research across two significant waves. the first wave in the 1960s emphasized psychological foundations of curiosity. Curiosity has been that between state and trait curiosity. state curiosity refers to curiosity in a particular situation, whereas trait curios ity refers to a general capacity or propensity to experience curi osity. for example, naylor's mci includes trait and state. A new account of curiosity is offered that attempts to address these shortcomings. the new account interprets curiosity as a form of cognitively induced deprivation that arises from the perception of a gap in knowledge or understanding. This article reviews the literature on curiosity with a focus on the four central issues that were investigated in the two waves of research: curiosity's definition and dimensionality, its underly ing cause, the explanation for voluntary exposure to curiosity, and curiosity's situational determinants. A few years before writing it i had become interested in the phenomenon of curiosity. i read all the literature on curiosity that i could get my hands on, came up with my own “information gap” theory, and ran a series of studies to test the theory. This perspective aims to summarize this recent research, motivate new interest in the problem, and tentatively propose a framework for future studies of the neuroscience and psychology of curiosity.
Comments are closed.