Something About The Johnsons

When exploring something about the johnsons, it's essential to consider various aspects and implications. apostrophe - Is it The Johnsons or The Johnson's - English Language .... "The Johnsons" is the correct answer. "The Johnson's" is a possessive form of the proper noun, as in the Johnson's house, the Johnson's blasé attitude towards telemarketers, The Johnson's willingness to run from danger, etc. Moreover, etymology - People's names as names for genitalia? - English Language ....

There are some popular examples in Portuguese (pt_PT) too, specially for common names. For instance Zé (which is short for José) is sometimes used as Zézinho (sort of: the little Zé) to refer to the penis. How do you pluralize a last name ending in y? Pluralisation of surnames: Making a last name plural should never involve an apostrophe.

The members of the Johnson and Smith families, for instance, are the Johnsons and the Smiths, not the Johnson’s and the Smith’s. Last names ending in s are no different. Most nouns ending in s are pluralized by adding es. Equally important, this applies to last names as well. "Welcome to the Jones__": Plural or Plural Possessive?.

It somewhat depends on if you want to intend possession of something. In this context, you likely do because the implication is "Welcome to the Jones' [house]". For that reason I would go with Jones'. If you are just pluralizing Jones, then, yes, it's Joneses. As in, "We are the Joneses.".

In your case you are wanting a sign that indicates it's the home of the Jones family, the home you possess or own. This perspective suggests that, party at the Johnsons's? - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange. The party is at the Johnsons's Assuming, the regular form of the last name is "Johnson" and there are at least two people in the Johnson family.

I assume it should be possessive because it is implied that it is referring to their house. In relation to this, what would the correct form be for a last name ending in an S in its singular form? From another angle, is "Sent to say" proper? From tchrist: Joe sent whom to say what? You have to send something, and you are welcome to send someone something, too, like sending someone to say something. But send is not catenative like go or come, and I cannot fathom how the to -infinitive can possibly work as a direct object for send without some indirect object involved.

I'm looking for a word that means "something must occur with another ....