let s buildsomething to break represents a topic that has garnered significant attention and interest. "lets": which is correct? - English Language .... Let’s is the English cohortative word, meaning “let us” in an exhortation of the group including the speaker to do something. Lets is the third person singular present tense form of the verb let meaning to permit or allow.
In the questioner’s examples, the sentence means to say “Product (allows/permits you to) do something awesome”, so the form with lets is correct. meaning - Difference between Let, Let's and Lets? Many people use "let, let's and lets" in conversation What's the difference between them? infinitives - Passive of verb "let" : with or without "to" - English ....
Page 64 of the fourth edition of Practical English Usage reads Verbs which can be followed, in active structures, by object + infinitive without to, use to-infinitives in passive structures. apostrophe - Etymology of "let us" and "let's" - English Language .... The verb let means “allow”, “permit”, “not prevent or forbid”, “pass, go or come” and it's used with an object and the bare infinitive.
Are you going to let me drive or not? The phrase "let alone" - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange. I notice that "let alone" is used in sentences that have a comma. The structure of the sentence is what comes before the comma is some kind of negative statement.
Right after the comma is "let alon... grammar - Function of verb “to let someone do something” - English .... Some verbs like let (or sense verbs like see, watch, hear, and feel) can take infinitive object clauses ("complements") without a to; it's a special exception for those verbs only. All others, like want or allow, need a to marking their infinitive complements. idioms - Meaning of "let bygones be bygones" - English Language & Usage ....
In this context, 'Let bygones be bygones' uses both meanings of the word 'bygones' and means, in extended form, 'let the unpleasantness between us become a thing of the past'. So I think, the meaning of the phrase is closer to your first meaning versus the second. Let normally occurs with a clause of some sort as complement, and passive is unlikely with a clausal object: Bill wants me to come to the party would be passivized to *For me to come to the party is wanted by Bill, which is hardly an improvement.
So let doesn't normally passivize. In relation to this, "Please let me know." - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange. The issue is whether the sentence can stand on its own; "Let me know" can but doesn't really acquire useful meaning without a context.
The examples I offered are other sentences with similar structures. "Let me [verb]" seems okay to me; so does " [verb]." Feel free to look for a verb that doesn't work here; it wouldn't surprise me if one exists. phrases - Let's get started! In "Let's get started", the starting point is in view and "Let's get going", you are on the starting point already.
📝 Summary
The key takeaways from this article on let s build something to break show the significance of understanding these concepts. Through implementing this knowledge, one can achieve better results.