Wikipedia Talk Reliable Sources Perennial Sources Archive 1 Wikipedia This is an archive of past discussions on talk:reliable sources perennial sources. do not edit the contents of this page. if you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. This is a non exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on are frequently discussed. this list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on .
Wikipedia Talk Reliable Sources Perennial Sources Archive 1 Wikipedia If you're concerned about any source being used on , you should review the reliable sources noticeboard (rsn), following the instructions at the top of that page, where you can "search the noticeboard archives":. Examples include perennial sources lists on various language s, topical reliable sources lists from individual wikiprojects, and newsrooms that publish their internal measures of source reliability. 1how to use this list. toggle how to use this list subsection. 1.1what if a source is not here? 1.2what this page is. 1.3what this page is not. 2how to improve this list. toggle how to improve this list subsection. 2.1inclusion criteria. 2.2instructions. 3legend. These are all the reliable sources extracted from subpages 1 – 8. (there might be a few stragglers missing, especially if they were the last row on a subpage.).
Wikipedia Talk Reliable Sources Perennial Sources Archive 1 Wikipedia 1how to use this list. toggle how to use this list subsection. 1.1what if a source is not here? 1.2what this page is. 1.3what this page is not. 2how to improve this list. toggle how to improve this list subsection. 2.1inclusion criteria. 2.2instructions. 3legend. These are all the reliable sources extracted from subpages 1 – 8. (there might be a few stragglers missing, especially if they were the last row on a subpage.). To discuss the reliability of a source, please start or join a discussion on the reliable sources noticeboard (wp:rsn). discussions on the noticeboard will be added to this list. Reliability discussions are held on the reliable sources noticeboard, a public forum. editors discuss how well a source complies with 's guideline on reliable sources. If you have a new source that needs to be added to the table, please add it to :reliable sources perennial sources x for the time being. according to the result of this rfc, the table format will be replaced by one involving separate pages. you are invited to discuss the new format. The perennial sources list catalogs sources under four categories, "generally reliable", "marginally reliable", "generally unreliable", and "deprecated". generally reliable sources must be "independent, published sources with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy".
Wikipedia Talk Reliable Sources Perennial Sources Archive 1 Wikipedia To discuss the reliability of a source, please start or join a discussion on the reliable sources noticeboard (wp:rsn). discussions on the noticeboard will be added to this list. Reliability discussions are held on the reliable sources noticeboard, a public forum. editors discuss how well a source complies with 's guideline on reliable sources. If you have a new source that needs to be added to the table, please add it to :reliable sources perennial sources x for the time being. according to the result of this rfc, the table format will be replaced by one involving separate pages. you are invited to discuss the new format. The perennial sources list catalogs sources under four categories, "generally reliable", "marginally reliable", "generally unreliable", and "deprecated". generally reliable sources must be "independent, published sources with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy".
Comments are closed.