why am i here represents a topic that has garnered significant attention and interest. Why am I this particular human being? - Philosophy Stack Exchange. I am here and now x because universal events have led to x, a conscious being. It's important to note that, if we accept the monist panpsychist view that the fundamental stuff of the universe is matter-consciousness, then the existence of a self-conscious being, x, is allowed.
existentialism - Does philosophy ask "why am I here" to help us .... Moreover, 3 Does philosophy ask "why am I here" in the sense of helping us understand how we got here? Specifically, will philosophy help (I'm sure they won't answer it directly!) me understand why it is that I am here, rather than somewhere else (flying to mars, homeless, whatever)? The vertiginous question: Why am I me and not someone else?.
The only way I can think of that "Why am I me?" wouldn't just be a tautology, is if you're really asking "Why is my soul in my body?" However, this question is only meaningful if you presuppose that you have a soul independent of your body, which you don't. I can not understand why do I exist? From another angle, can someone explain it to me with the language of philosophy, Why do I exist? Why am I here, on earth? In relation to this, why do I exist here but not in another planet?
What is the I in "I think therefore I am"? Also, why is “I think” the same as “I am experiencing a thought”? Equally important, the former seems to involve an active action and the latter seems more passive. Your observation is correct, they are very similar but not the same. For more information here is a link to active vs passive writing.
Noli plus legere in sententiam quam ibi Why am I myself rather than someone else? In this context, i think I read something like this in an encyclopedia; that it's a question in philosophy. Similarly, not asking what makes me myself, my body, psychology, and narrative history. I'm asking why it is that these are mine, rather than yours. How is it that we are able to possess our own attributes?
Does the famous Descartes quote "dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum .... A further expansion, dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum—res cogitans ("…—a thinking thing") extends the cogito with Descartes's statement in the subsequent Meditation, "I am a thinking (conscious) thing, that is, a being who doubts, affirms, denies, knows a few objects, and is ignorant of many …". Why is "cogito" needed as a step in "dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum"?. He originally published it in French as je pense, donc je suis (I think, therefore I am) In the posthumously published The Search for Truth by Natural Light, he expressed this insight as dubito, ergo sum, vel, quod idem est, cogito, ergo sum ("I doubt, therefore I am — or what is the same — I think, therefore I am"). Why "guilty" or "not guilty" but not "guilty" or "innocent"?.
Jury nullification is a good example of why we have "guilty" and "not guilty" instead of "guilty" and "innocent".
📝 Summary
Throughout this article, we've analyzed the multiple aspects of why am i here. These insights not only teach, and they help individuals to benefit in real ways.