Reconstructing Digital Sovereignty

Reconstructing Digital Sovereignty “reclaiming digital sovereignty: a roadmap to build a digital stack for people and the planet” calls for public led, ecologically responsible, and socially just digital systems that serve collective needs — not private profit or nationalist agendas. But we believe that individual countries can advance their degrees of digital sovereignty by implementing key regulations and fostering the first steps of a truly public digital stack.

Reconstructing Digital Sovereignty In this paper, we take an alternative approach focused on assessing the effectiveness of various models of digital sovereignty. This article examines the legal and national security dimensions of indonesia’s evolving approach to data privacy within the broader project of digital sovereignty. Drawing mainly on various theories concerning political economy, international law, human rights, and data protection, it presents thought provoking ideas about the nature and scope of digital sovereignty. Reconceptualizing sovereignty as governance capacity rather than exclusive control, the article contributes to emerging debates on algorithmic governance, platform power, and digital constitutionalism.

Is Digital Sovereignty Sustainable Unu Cris Drawing mainly on various theories concerning political economy, international law, human rights, and data protection, it presents thought provoking ideas about the nature and scope of digital sovereignty. Reconceptualizing sovereignty as governance capacity rather than exclusive control, the article contributes to emerging debates on algorithmic governance, platform power, and digital constitutionalism. This special issue, titled unthinking digital sovereignty, explores a number of definitions and perspectives on digital sovereignty from europe, the united states, china, india, south africa, uganda, and indigenous communities, with a case study on mexico. Digital sovereignty is a complex challenge for governments. empirical measurement for six countries reveals varying degrees of sovereignty. no state is truly digitally sovereign. de facto practices sometimes contradict stated policies. security policies and it provisioning are often loosely coupled. This article offers a mapping of the types of national digital sovereignty that are emerging, while testing their effectiveness in response to radical changes and challenges. Craft a research agenda focused on digital developments that could solve collective problems and enhance human capacities and that consider the ethical, economic, ecological, and political impacts of technology, including of ai applications.

Digital Sovereignty Need Challenges This special issue, titled unthinking digital sovereignty, explores a number of definitions and perspectives on digital sovereignty from europe, the united states, china, india, south africa, uganda, and indigenous communities, with a case study on mexico. Digital sovereignty is a complex challenge for governments. empirical measurement for six countries reveals varying degrees of sovereignty. no state is truly digitally sovereign. de facto practices sometimes contradict stated policies. security policies and it provisioning are often loosely coupled. This article offers a mapping of the types of national digital sovereignty that are emerging, while testing their effectiveness in response to radical changes and challenges. Craft a research agenda focused on digital developments that could solve collective problems and enhance human capacities and that consider the ethical, economic, ecological, and political impacts of technology, including of ai applications.