The Erosion Of Human Rights Reporting By The Usa And Its Ripple Effects Today, the danish presidency of the council of the eu and european parliament negotiators reached a provisional agreement on eu legislation that revises the safe third country concept and will expand the circumstances under which an asylum application can be rejected as inadmissable. This document sets out unhcr’s position on the european commission’s proposal of 20 may 2025, which proposes to change the rules set out in regulation (eu) 2024 1348 (‘asylum procedure regulation’ or ‘apr’) regarding the safe third country (‘stc’) concept.1.
What Is The Safe Third Country Agreement Cbc News On 18 december, the european parliament and council agreed on proposed rules amending the ‘safe third country’ concept in the eu asylum procedures regulation, as well as introducing an eu wide ‘safe countries of origin’ list. On 18 december 2025, the european parliament and council reached a political agreement to establish the first eu wide list of safe countries of origin and update safe third country rules, aiming to accelerate asylum processing amid declining irregular border crossings across europe. Parliament and council negotiators have reached a political agreement on updates to the 2024 asylum law regarding the conditions for applying the rules on safe third countries. In april, the european commission designated bangladesh, colombia, egypt, india, kosovo, morocco, and tunisia as "safe countries of origin," allowing for fast tracked asylum procedures and a higher likelihood of rejection.
What Is The Safe Third Country Agreement Cbc News Parliament and council negotiators have reached a political agreement on updates to the 2024 asylum law regarding the conditions for applying the rules on safe third countries. In april, the european commission designated bangladesh, colombia, egypt, india, kosovo, morocco, and tunisia as "safe countries of origin," allowing for fast tracked asylum procedures and a higher likelihood of rejection. This will happen even though the people are refugees and even when the third country is not actually safe. the first change means that it can happen even when they have no connection with the country and the second change means that they may be deported before the conclusion of the legal process. This is not fiction. it may soon be european law. this concern arises from the amendments proposed by the european commission in may 2025. under the asylum procedure regulation (apr), the commission is required to review the safe third country (stc) concept and, where necessary, propose amendments. The eu’s may 2025 proposal expands the safe third country rule, allowing quicker asylum rejection and deportation. this aims to reduce pressure on asylum systems but raises serious human rights concerns regarding refoulement and burden on poorer countries. Under the current eu framework, member states may consider an asylum application inadmissible if the applicant could receive protection in a third country deemed safe. however, applying this concept requires demonstrating a connection between the applicant and the safe third country.
Eu New Safe Third Country Proposals Cynical Attempt To Downgrade This will happen even though the people are refugees and even when the third country is not actually safe. the first change means that it can happen even when they have no connection with the country and the second change means that they may be deported before the conclusion of the legal process. This is not fiction. it may soon be european law. this concern arises from the amendments proposed by the european commission in may 2025. under the asylum procedure regulation (apr), the commission is required to review the safe third country (stc) concept and, where necessary, propose amendments. The eu’s may 2025 proposal expands the safe third country rule, allowing quicker asylum rejection and deportation. this aims to reduce pressure on asylum systems but raises serious human rights concerns regarding refoulement and burden on poorer countries. Under the current eu framework, member states may consider an asylum application inadmissible if the applicant could receive protection in a third country deemed safe. however, applying this concept requires demonstrating a connection between the applicant and the safe third country.
Comments are closed.