Duolingo Fail On Tumblr Please, would you give me some further coffee? vs. please, would you give me some more coffee? could you think of when and or where we could use further meaning more? thanks in advance. When "more" is used before adjective or adverb as "inconvenient" in your example, it is an adverb whose primary function is to modify the following word. however, when it is used before a noun (or sometimes after a noun), it is used as a determiner or adjective. for example: i need more money. more context is required. i need something more (to eat). in the above examples, it means: greater in.
Really Duo R Duolingo Should i use most simple or simplest to indicate something cannot be more simple? can i use both? is one prefered? if simplest how is that pronounced? (is the e silent?). I got confused with “ stricter and more strict”, strictest and most strict”. what is the rule about this or both are correct? let me make a sentence with stricter dan is stricter than ryan about. In case (a) you are asking which of the boxes has more desirable qualities than the other. this is question you would most likely ask to a person to get their opinion. preferred is a verb. in case (b) you are asking which of the boxes would be more likely asking a statistics question, how many people would prefer box 1 and how many would prefer. That really depends on what you want to say. if you are talking about what should be combined with "less" (and only with "less"), it's "happy", not "happier". however, there is a construction where "no less" (mind you, not "no t less") is combined with [] er. for example, no less happier than the rest of us this has a connotation of "in no way unhappier"—there is a hint of an emphasis there.
Come On Duo R Duolingo In case (a) you are asking which of the boxes has more desirable qualities than the other. this is question you would most likely ask to a person to get their opinion. preferred is a verb. in case (b) you are asking which of the boxes would be more likely asking a statistics question, how many people would prefer box 1 and how many would prefer. That really depends on what you want to say. if you are talking about what should be combined with "less" (and only with "less"), it's "happy", not "happier". however, there is a construction where "no less" (mind you, not "no t less") is combined with [] er. for example, no less happier than the rest of us this has a connotation of "in no way unhappier"—there is a hint of an emphasis there. There is no difference. you are is normally contracted to you're in speech, because english doesn't like two vowels without a consonant to separate them, and one of them gets deleted. either you're or you are can be used; speaker's choice. the same thing applies to i'm, he's, she's, we're, and they're, among other contractions. it's just colloquial english, that's all. Yes, the sentence is much more fluent without the about. the simplest answer is "because that's not how we generally speak in english"; you can see how much more common explain this is than explain about this is. it is not impossible to use explain with about, but explain usually takes a direct object, which is the thing that you are explaining. "explain about x" carries a sense of "to speak. Consider the following sentence: for better clarity, we will now explain in detail how this works. is "for better clarity" correct as an expression? googling for it gives a number of results but. For example, " my son's toys " will be "the toys that belong to my son". we use only an apostrophe (') after plural nouns that end in s: " my sons' toys " means that i have more than one son and these are their toys. we use 's for possession with the other plural nouns. for example: " my children's toys; women's wishes, etc.
Finally R Duolingo There is no difference. you are is normally contracted to you're in speech, because english doesn't like two vowels without a consonant to separate them, and one of them gets deleted. either you're or you are can be used; speaker's choice. the same thing applies to i'm, he's, she's, we're, and they're, among other contractions. it's just colloquial english, that's all. Yes, the sentence is much more fluent without the about. the simplest answer is "because that's not how we generally speak in english"; you can see how much more common explain this is than explain about this is. it is not impossible to use explain with about, but explain usually takes a direct object, which is the thing that you are explaining. "explain about x" carries a sense of "to speak. Consider the following sentence: for better clarity, we will now explain in detail how this works. is "for better clarity" correct as an expression? googling for it gives a number of results but. For example, " my son's toys " will be "the toys that belong to my son". we use only an apostrophe (') after plural nouns that end in s: " my sons' toys " means that i have more than one son and these are their toys. we use 's for possession with the other plural nouns. for example: " my children's toys; women's wishes, etc.
Comments are closed.