Equitable Access In Smart Cities In asia, smart city development highlights tensions between rapid urbanization and equitable access, especially regarding gender equity, environmental justice, and digital divides. In this context, the second session of the united nations habitat assembly (2023), through resolution 2 1, requested un habitat to initiate the development of international guidelines on people centred smart cities as a non binding framework for developing national and local smart city regulations, plans and strategies, which would ensure that.
Equitable Access In Smart Cities The dual nature of these technologies, serving as both facilitators and barriers, underscores the importance of addressing digital divides to ensure equitable access to and sharing all the benefits of smart city developments. Discover how smart cities can bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable access to services, technology, and opportunities. Ensuring equitable access to smart city technologies requires deliberate policies, affordable infrastructure, digital literacy programs, and community involvement to address barriers like cost, skills, and trust for all residents. Bridging digital divides for socially sustainable and inclusive cities. this paper aims to emphasize the need for enhancing inclusivity and accessibility within smart city societies.
Equitable Access In Smart Cities Ensuring equitable access to smart city technologies requires deliberate policies, affordable infrastructure, digital literacy programs, and community involvement to address barriers like cost, skills, and trust for all residents. Bridging digital divides for socially sustainable and inclusive cities. this paper aims to emphasize the need for enhancing inclusivity and accessibility within smart city societies. This paper examines the inclusivity of smart services, emphasising the need for digital equality while also discussing privacy regulations and the role of trust in fostering citizen engagement. For instance, haque et al. (2025) provide a systematic review of notions of justice and ethics in smart cities, positioning them as central concerns and calling for “policies and governance approaches that promote a just, equitable, responsible, and inclusive smart city ecosystem” (p. 1). While cities like jakarta and bandung rank high in smart city indices, they simultaneously report high gini coefficients, indicating that the benefits of smart technologies are not equally distributed. While cities on a global scale embrace smartness as a roadmap for efficient urban governance, disparities persist in the domain of digital accessibility, literacy, and skills, with manifestations of digital exclusion, ageism, and ableism prevalent in most digital urban experiences.
Building Equitable Smart Cities Giving Compass This paper examines the inclusivity of smart services, emphasising the need for digital equality while also discussing privacy regulations and the role of trust in fostering citizen engagement. For instance, haque et al. (2025) provide a systematic review of notions of justice and ethics in smart cities, positioning them as central concerns and calling for “policies and governance approaches that promote a just, equitable, responsible, and inclusive smart city ecosystem” (p. 1). While cities like jakarta and bandung rank high in smart city indices, they simultaneously report high gini coefficients, indicating that the benefits of smart technologies are not equally distributed. While cities on a global scale embrace smartness as a roadmap for efficient urban governance, disparities persist in the domain of digital accessibility, literacy, and skills, with manifestations of digital exclusion, ageism, and ableism prevalent in most digital urban experiences.
Comments are closed.