Cod Removal Efficiency And Concentration Variation With F M Download

Cod Removal Efficiency And Concentration Variation With F M Download Download scientific diagram | cod removal efficiency and concentration variation with f m. from publication: performance of sewage treatment of basrah university operated using. Case study: improved cod removal and decreased tss concentration the application of novozymes bioremovetm cod to a beverage company’s wastewater treatment plant lead to improved cod removal and decreased tss concentration.

Concentration Of Cod And Variation Of Cod Removal Efficiency On Optimum condition at 100mg l of alum dosage, 4.5 ph and 23.5 g l concentration, cod removal efficiency was found to be 67.86%. these results reveal the applicability of coagulation treatment to the sago wastewater as an alternative approach. Variations of mlss and mlvss concentration as well as population of mixed halophilic bacteria during 112 days operation of the mbr (stage 1, 2 and 3 refer to operation of the mbr at an olr of 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 kg cod m ? d~", respectively. Figure 2 demonstrates the variation of cod concentration and cod removal efficiency in the sbr at various aeration durations. as shown, cod removal increased significantly with the. Under optimal conditions, the amount of residual cod in the effluent reached 36 \ (\mathrm {mg} \mathrm {l}\), showing an augmentation in the efficiency of the desired system. moreover, empirical correlations are proposed for double factorial optimization of residual cod and cod removal.

Variation Of Effluent Cod Concentration Cod Removal Efficiency And Figure 2 demonstrates the variation of cod concentration and cod removal efficiency in the sbr at various aeration durations. as shown, cod removal increased significantly with the. Under optimal conditions, the amount of residual cod in the effluent reached 36 \ (\mathrm {mg} \mathrm {l}\), showing an augmentation in the efficiency of the desired system. moreover, empirical correlations are proposed for double factorial optimization of residual cod and cod removal. Predictive models of cod removal for processes using anodes of aluminum or iron were developed. r2 values of 95.8% and 94.2% were achieved using aluminum and iron anodes, respectively. Different factors are considered to evaluate the removal efficiency of cod like; ph (3–9), reaction time (15–60 min), and current density (9.23–45 a m 2). based on this influencing factor al–al and fe–fe can remove cod up to 87.5 % and 90 % respectively. Rease and chemical oxygen demand (cod) can be treated successfully obtaining high removal efficiencies. the purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of current density on the performance of oil grease removal (og), cod, and tu. Cod removal efficiencies are lower (<70%) for f m ratios higher than 0.30 kg cod kg −1 mlss per day. a total of 92% cod removal efficiency was achieved at f m ratios varying.