C Linq To Sql Query Not Returning Correct Items Stack Overflow

C Linq To Sql Query Not Returning Correct Items Stack Overflow Var query = context.logisticsrequests.asqueryable().where(x => x.type == types.collection.tostring()); a new option to delete a request has been added however this is just a new column in the db called isdeleted, this way the request is removed from the table but there is still an archived copy. When i try to query the data, i use the the following linq statement: in the data i have some persons, where the forname is "test" like. if i loop through the results with foreach, i get the following output: test tester1. the count is correct, but the values are only the ones from the first record.

C Linq To Sql Query Not Returning Correct Datetime Stack Overflow The problem is that when the applicant has no applicantaddresses, then the expression returns null for that specific request. the correct behavior should be that a requestresultmodel should still be returned but with empty address information. unfortunately, i can only think of doing this in two steps like this: var address = request.applicant. If you define your initial query path to include related objects by using the include method on the objectquery and then use linq to project the returned objects to an anonymous type, the objects specified in the include method are not included in the query results. Typically, when no rows are returned from a query it is down to one of two things: either your joins are resulting in an empty set or your filter criteria (where) is eliminating rows from the result set. I have looked but can't figure out how to modify my linq query so it will return all rows even if the child table can't be linked in due to a null value. in testing this seems to work fine in ef6 but when i run it against ef core it does not work. here is the query: var changeorderslist = dbcontext.changeorders. .include(co => co.approvalstatus).

C Linq To Sql Query Not Returning Correct Datetime Stack Overflow Typically, when no rows are returned from a query it is down to one of two things: either your joins are resulting in an empty set or your filter criteria (where) is eliminating rows from the result set. I have looked but can't figure out how to modify my linq query so it will return all rows even if the child table can't be linked in due to a null value. in testing this seems to work fine in ef6 but when i run it against ef core it does not work. here is the query: var changeorderslist = dbcontext.changeorders. .include(co => co.approvalstatus). Here are five common mistakes we make when working with linq for the first time and how to fix them. we should always prefer any over count to check if a collection is empty or has at least one element that meets a condition. let’s write, instead of, any returns when it finds at least one element. In ef core 2.0.0 preview1 final release the linq average command was correctly converted to the sql avg command. in release 2.0.0 this seems to be broken. if you are seeing an exception, include the full exceptions details (message and stack trace). Where i want to use subqueries to limit the objects returned, i can combine the sql based syntax with the method based syntax by calling the where method on the collection in my from clause, as in this example: var canadacustomers = from c in db.customers.where(cust => cust.region == "canada") select new {c.custid, c.name};. I have a stored procedure that when executed in ssms returns different values than when the same sp is executed in code, even a very simple sp call and dump in linqpad.

Php Sql Query Not Returning Correct Results Stack Overflow Here are five common mistakes we make when working with linq for the first time and how to fix them. we should always prefer any over count to check if a collection is empty or has at least one element that meets a condition. let’s write, instead of, any returns when it finds at least one element. In ef core 2.0.0 preview1 final release the linq average command was correctly converted to the sql avg command. in release 2.0.0 this seems to be broken. if you are seeing an exception, include the full exceptions details (message and stack trace). Where i want to use subqueries to limit the objects returned, i can combine the sql based syntax with the method based syntax by calling the where method on the collection in my from clause, as in this example: var canadacustomers = from c in db.customers.where(cust => cust.region == "canada") select new {c.custid, c.name};. I have a stored procedure that when executed in ssms returns different values than when the same sp is executed in code, even a very simple sp call and dump in linqpad.