That If Things

In recent times, that if things has become increasingly relevant in various contexts. How do you handle "thatthat"? The double "that" problem. Have you ever had a case where you felt compelled to include strange things like a double that in a sentence?

If so, then what did you do to resolve this? For me, I never knew whether it was accep... "Given" versus "Given that" - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange. I just received a proofread version of an academic manuscript from my copy editor. She essentially changed all of the instances in which I had written "given that" to "given." I've tried to read up... In relation to this, using a comma after "that" - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange.

I would like to know if you can use "that" with a comma after it. For example: Findings show that, during the initial stages of love, there is increased blood flow to the brain. How to avoid that "that that" that is so very awkward.

Similarly, in all seriousness, are there any common patterns or strategies people use to avoid having to write a sentence in which "that that" appears? For example: Evidential decision theory recommends ta... pronouns - When to use “that” and when to use “which”, especially in .... Actually, there's more to this than mentioned in some other answers.

The word that is a subordinator; it is not a relative word like who, where, when, or which. Even in integrated relative clauses, they are not always interchangeable. When the relative construction follows a fronted preposition, only relative words will do, so relative pronoun which is available, but that isn't.

comma or semicolon before "that is" and repeating 'that'. Similarly, of the below answer, the following section (example 1) is incorrect: Your new example now contains a main verb (=, that is, equals), so what you have is correct. But you can use either a semicolon or commas. To use a "simpler" sentence: 1 *We need to show that 2 plus 2 equals 4; that is, that 4 is the sum of 2 and 2.

In 1, we have two separate clauses, which we can join with a semicolon; the ... From another angle, "that" + "would" = "that'd"? - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange. Is "that'd" an appropriate contraction of "that" and "would"?

I say it, but I'm not sure if it's a legitimate contraction in written form. Should I use "who" or "that" when referring to an organisation?. I generally use the rule of thumb of using who when referring to a person and that when referring to an object.