Foundationalism

In recent times, foundationalism has become increasingly relevant in various contexts. Foundationalism - Wikipedia. Foundationalism is an attempt to respond to the regress problem of justification in epistemology. According to this argument, every proposition requires justification to support it, but any justification also needs to be justified itself.

Foundationalist Theories of Epistemic Justification. Building on this, according to foundationalism, any justified belief must either be foundational or depend for its justification, ultimately, on foundational beliefs. Historically, foundationalism was very widely, almost universally accepted. Foundationalism - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Foundationalists maintain that some beliefs are properly basic and that the rest of one’s beliefs inherit their epistemic status (knowledge or justification) in virtue of receiving proper support from the basic beliefs.

Foundationalism | Rationalism, Empiricism & Skepticism .... Building on this, foundationalism, in epistemology, the view that some beliefs can justifiably be held by inference from other beliefs, which themselves are justified directly—e.g., on the basis of rational intuition or sense perception. Foundationalism and Coherentism: An Overview - Philosophos. Foundationalism is the belief that there is a set of beliefs or propositions that are self-evident and indubitable, and from which other beliefs can be logically derived.

Foundationalism - Cambridge University Press & Assessment. It then explores disagreements among foundationalists about how to understand foundational knowledge and justified belief, what is plausibly included in the foundations, and what is required for legitimate inference from foundations to the rest of what we believe. The Foundations of Foundationalism - JSTOR. From another angle, the reflections that follow are not meant to settle the controversy, but only to help us under- stand it more clearly. Foundationalism is often defended as the only acceptable alternative to an infinite regress of justification.